Surgical Stabilization Of Rib Fractures Research Articles

Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in the Geriatric Trauma Population Is Associated with Equivalent Outcomes to a Younger Cohort: A Propensity Matched Analysis

BackgroundSurgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) improves outcomes in chest wall trauma. Geriatric patients are particularly vulnerable to poor outcomes; yet, this population is often excluded from SSRF studies. Further delineating patient outcomes by age is necessary to optimize care for the aging trauma population. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted examining outcomes among patients aged 40+ for whom an SSRF consult was placed between 2017 and 2022 at a level 1 trauma center. Patients were categorized into geriatric (65+) and adult (40-64), as well as 80 years and older (80+) and 79 and younger (40-79). Patient outcomes were assessed comparing non-operative and operative management of chest wall trauma. Propensity matched analysis was performed to evaluate mortality differences between adult and geriatric patients who did and did not undergo SSRF. ResultsA total of 543 patients had an SSRF consult. Of these, 227 were 65+, and 73 were 80+. A total of 129 patients underwent SSRF (24%). The percentage of patients undergoing SSRF did not vary between 40-64 and 65+ (23.7% and 23.6%, respectively, p=0.97) or 40-79 and 80+ (24.0 vs 21.9, p=0.69). Patients undergoing SSRF had higher chest injury burden and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation and ICU level care on admission. Overall, in-hospital mortality rate was 4.6%. Among patients who underwent SSRF, mortality rate did not significantly differ between 65+ and 40-64 (7.8% vs 2.7%, p=0.18) or 80+ and 40-79 (6.3% vs 4.6%, p=0.77). This remained true in propensity matched analysis. ConclusionGeriatric and octogenarian patients with rib fractures underwent SSRF at similar rates and achieved equivalent outcomes to their younger counterparts. SSRF did not differentially affect mortality outcomes based on age group in propensity matched analysis. SSRF is safe for geriatric patients including octogenarians.

The application of electrical impedance tomography and surgical outcomes of thoracoscope-assisted surgical stabilization of rib fractures in severe chest trauma

Serious blunt chest trauma usually induces hemothorax, pneumothorax, and rib fractures. More studies have claimed that early video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) results in a good prognosis in patients with major trauma. This study aimed to verify the outcomes in patients with chest trauma whether SSRF was performed. Consecutive patients who were treated in a medical center in Taiwan, for traumatic events between January 2015 and June 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. This study focused on patients with major trauma and thoracic injuries, and they were divided into groups based on whether they received SSRF. We used electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to evaluate the change of ventilation conditions. Different scores used for the evaluation of trauma severity were also compared in this study. Among the 8396 patients who were included, 1529 (18.21%) had major trauma with injury severity score > 16 and were admitted to the intensive care unit initially. A total of 596 patients with chest trauma were admitted, of whom 519 (87%) survived. Younger age and a lower trauma score (including injury severity scale, new injury severity score, trauma and injury severity score, and revised trauma score) account for better survival rates. Moreover, 74 patients received SSRF. They had a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay (5.24, p = 0.045) and better performance in electrical impedance tomography (23.46, p < 0.001). In patients with major thoracic injury, older age and higher injury survival scale account for higher mortality rate. Effective surgical stabilization of rib fractures shortened the ICU stay and helped achieve better performance in EIT. Thoracoscope-assisted rib fixation is suggested in severe trauma cases.

The Effects of Pulmonary Risk Factors and Combination Thoracic Osseous Fractures on Mortality and Outcomes of Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures.

Rib fixation for traumatic rib fractures is advocated to decrease morbidity and mortality in select patient populations. We intended to investigate the effect of combination osseous thoracic injuries on mortality with the hypothesis that combination injuries will worsen overall mortality and that SSRF will improve outcomes in combination injuries and in high-risk patients. Patients with rib fractures were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Project registry from 2019. Patients were then divided into rib fracture(s) alone or in combination with sternal, thoracic vertebra, or scapula fracture. Patients were also categorized into those with COPD and smokers. Patients with AIS >3 outside of thorax were excluded. Patients were subcategorized into those who had rib fixation verse nonoperative management for all subgroups. Analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of rib fixation. A total of 111,066 patients were included for analysis. The overall mortality was 1.4%. Patients with COPD had over double the mortality risk, with an overall mortality of 3.4%. Combination injuries did not appear to increase mortality. SSRF did not decrease mortality; however, the number of patients in this group was too small to complete statistical analysis. The overall complication rate was 0.43%. There was a trend towards an increase in extrapulmonary complications in the group that underwent surgical fixation. Mortality from rib fractures with concomitant osseous thoracic fracture appears to be low. However, mortality is increased in patients with COPD regardless of rib fracture pattern. The number of patients who underwent SSRF was too small to make a statistical comparison.

Contemporary Management of Patients with Multiple Rib Fractures: What You Need to Know.

10% of all injured patients and 55% of patients with blunt chest trauma experience rib fractures. The incidence of death due to rib fractures is related to the number of fractured ribs, severity of fractured ribs, and patient age and co-morbid conditions. Death due to rib fracture is mostly caused by pneumonia due to inability to expectorate and take deep breaths. Over the last 25-30 years, there has been renewed interest in surgical stabilization of rib fractures, known colloquially as "rib plating". This review will present what you need to know in regards to triage decisions on whether or not to admit a patient to the hospital, the location to which they should be admitted, criteria and evidentiary support for SSRF, timing to SSRF, and operative technique. The review also addresses the cost-effectiveness of this operation and stresses non-operative treatment modalities that should be implemented prior to operation.Article TypeReview, Level III.

Commentary: Optimal Timing for Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: When Is Best?

Commentary: Optimal Timing for Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: When Is Best?

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures: The impact of volume and the need for standardized indications

IntroductionWe aimed to examine impact of trauma center (TC) surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) volume on outcomes of patients undergoing SSRF. MethodsBlunt rib fracture patients who underwent SSRF were included from ACS-TQIP2017-2021. TCs were stratified according to tertiles of SSRF volume:low (LV), middle, and high (HV). Outcomes were time to SSRF, respiratory complications, prolonged ventilator use, mortality. Results16,872 patients were identified (LV:5470,HV:5836). Mean age was 56 years, 74% were male, median thorax-AIS was 3. HV centers had a lower proportion of patients with flail chest (HV41% vs LV50%), pulmonary contusion (HV44% vs LV52%) and had shorter time to SSRF(HV58 vs LV76 ​h), less respiratory complications (HV3.2% vs LV4.5%), prolonged ventilator use (HV15% vs LV26%), mortality (HV2% vs LV2.6%) (all p ​< ​0.05). On multivariable regression analysis, HV centers were independently associated with reduced time to SSRF(β ​= ​−18.77,95%CI ​= ​−21.30to-16.25), respiratory complications (OR ​= ​0.67,95%CI ​= ​0.49–0.94), prolonged ventilator use (OR ​= ​0.49,95%CI ​= ​0.41–0.59), but not mortality. ConclusionsHV SSRF centers have improved outcomes, however, there are variations in threshold for SSRF and indications must be standardized. Level of evidenceLevel III. Study typeTherapeutic/Care Management.

Impact of obesity on outcomes after surgical stabilization of multiple rib fractures: Evidence from the US nationwide inpatient sample.

Obesity is a global health issue with increasing prevalence. Surgical procedures, such as surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), may be affected by obesity-related complications. The objective of the study is to investigate the effects of obesity on SSRF outcomes in multiple rib fractures. This retrospective study analyzed data from adults aged ≥ 20 years in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database diagnosed with multiple rib fractures who underwent SSRF between 2005 and 2018. It investigated the relationship between obesity and in-patient outcomes, such as discharge status, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and adverse events using logistic and linear regression analyses. Analysis of data from 1,754 patients (morbidly obese: 87; obese: 106; normal weight: 1,561) revealed that morbid obesity was associated with longer LOS (aBeta = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.07), higher hospital costs (aBeta = 47.35, 95% CI: 38.55, 56.14), increased risks of adverse events (aOR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.61), hemorrhage/need for transfusion (aOR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.79) and mechanical ventilation ≥ 96 hours (aOR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.28, 3.58) compared to normal weight patients. Among patients with flail chest, morbid obesity was significantly associated with tracheostomy (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.05, 4.32), ARDS/respiratory failure (aOR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.09, 3.70), and mechanical ventilation ≥ 96 hours (aOR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.47, 5.32). In contrast, morbid obesity had no significant associations with these adverse respiratory outcomes among patients without a flail chest (p > 0.05). Morbid obesity is associated with adverse outcomes following SSRF for multiple rib fractures, especially for flail chest patients.

Incidence and influence factors of venous thromboembolism in traumatic rib fracture patient: a multicenter study

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the incidence and influencing factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic rib fractures.MethodsThe retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients with traumatic rib fractures from 33 hospitals.ResultsThe overall incidence of VTE in hospitalized patients with traumatic rib fractures was 8.1%. Patients with isolated traumatic rib fractures had a significantly lower incidence of VTE (4.4%) compared to patients with rib fractures combined with other injuries (12.0%). Multivariate analysis identified the number of rib fractures as an independent risk factor for thrombosis. Surgical stabilization of isolated rib fractures involving three or more ribs was associated with a lower VTE incidence compared to conservative treatment.ConclusionsPatients with rib fractures have a higher incidence of VTE, positively correlated with the number of rib fractures. However, the occurrence of thrombosis is relatively low in isolated rib fractures. Targeted thromboprophylaxis strategies should be implemented for these patients, and surgical stabilization of rib fractures may be beneficial in reducing the risk of VTE.

Surgical Rib Fracture Fixation: Early Operative Intervention Improves Outcomes.

This study aimed to assess the outcomes of patients with complex rib fractures undergoing operative or nonoperative management at our major trauma center. A retrospective review of all patients who were considered for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) at a single major trauma center from May 2016 to September 2022 was performed. In total, 352 patients with complex rib fractures were identified. Thirty-seven patients (11%) fulfilled the criteria for surgical management and underwent SSRF. The SSRF group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with flail chest (32 [86%] vs. 94 [27%], p<0.001) or Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15 (37 [100%] vs. 129 [41%], p<0.001). No significant differences were seen between groups for 1-year mortality. Patients who underwent SSRF within 72 hours were 6 times less likely to develop pneumonia than those in whom SSRF was delayed for over 72 hours (2 [18%] vs. 15 [58%]; odds ratio, 0.163; 95% confidence interval, 0.029-0.909; p=0.036). Prompt SSRF showed non-significant associations with shorter intensive care unit length of stay (6 days vs. 10 days, p=0.140) and duration of mechanical ventilation (5 days vs. 8 days, p=0.177). SSRF was associated with a longer hospital length of stay compared to nonoperative patients with flail chest and/or ISS >15 (19 days vs. 13 days, p=0.012), whilst SSRF within 72 hours was not. Surgical fixation of complex rib fractures improves outcomes in selected patient groups. Delayed surgical fixation was associated with increased rates of pneumonia and a longer hospital length of stay.

Early Repair of Rib Fractures Is Associated with Superior Length of Stay and Total Hospital Cost: A Propensity Matched Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

Background and Objectives: Previous studies have suggested that early scheduling of the surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is associated with superior outcomes. It is unclear if these data are reproducible at other institutions. We hypothesized that early SSRF would be associated with decreased morbidity, length of stay, and total charges. Materials and Methods: Adult patients who underwent SSRF for multiple rib fractures or flail chest were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) by ICD-10 code from the fourth quarter of 2015 to 2016. Patients were excluded for traumatic brain injury and missing study variables. Procedures occurring after hospital day 10 were excluded to remove possible confounding. Early fixation was defined as procedures which occurred on hospital day 0 or 1, and late fixation was defined as procedures which occurred on hospital days 2 through 10. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of death, pneumonia, tracheostomy, or discharge to a short-term hospital, as determined by NIS coding. Secondary outcomes were length of hospitalization (LOS) and total cost. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum testing were performed to determine differences in outcomes between the groups. One-to-one propensity matching was performed using covariates known to affect the outcome of rib fractures. Stuart-Maxwell marginal homogeneity and Wilcoxon signed rank matched pair testing was performed on the propensity-matched cohort. Results: Of the 474 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 148 (31.2%) received early repair and 326 (68.8%) received late repair. In unmatched analysis, the composite adverse outcome was lower among early fixation (16.2% vs. 40.2%, p < 0.001), total hospital cost was less (USD114k vs. USD215k, p < 0.001), and length of stay was shorter (6 days vs. 12 days) among early SSRF patients. Propensity matching identified 131 matched pairs of early and late SSRF. Composite adverse outcomes were less common among early SSRF (18.3% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.011). The LOS was shorter among early SSRF (6 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.001), and total hospital cost was also lower among early SSRF patients (USD118k vs. USD183k late, p = 0.001). Conclusion: In a large administrative database, early SSRF was associated with reduced adverse outcomes, as well as improved hospital length of stay and total cost. These data corroborate other research and suggest that early SSRF is preferred. Studies of outcomes after SSRF should stratify analyses by timing of procedure.

Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures for Flail Chest: Analysis of Center-Based Variability in Practice and Outcomes.

Given the lack of high-quality data on patient selection for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), significant variability in practice likely exists across trauma centers. We aimed to determine whether centers with a more liberal approach to SSRF had improved outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with flail chest admitted to level I or II trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Improvement Program. The primary outcome was hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included discharge status, tracheostomy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and hospital length of stay. Logistic regression was performed to calculate center-level observed/expected rates of SSRF and centers were grouped into quintiles from "most liberal" to "most restrictive". Multivariable regression was used to determine the association between these quintiles and outcomes. We also used an instrumental variable analysis to evaluate the association between SSRF and mortality at the patient level. Among 23,619 patients with flail chest across 354 centers, 22% underwent SSRF. Center rates of fixation ranged from 0-88%. Higher rates of SSRF were not associated with lower mortality overall (highest vs. lowest quintile OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.63-1.17). However, centers with a more liberal approach to SSRF had lower rates of independent status at discharge, higher tracheostomy rates, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and longer hospital and ICU length of stay. The patient level analysis demonstrated that SSRF as was associated with a 25% lower risk of death. Overall, centers with a liberal approach to SSRF do not show improved outcomes among patients with a flail chest, but have higher resource utilization. Results at the patient level suggest that there is a population likely to benefit but these patients remain to be identified through further research. Prognostic/epidemiological, Level III.

Recent Advances in Rib Plating.

Rib fractures are a common injury in blunt trauma and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) have led to better patient outcomes for those with highly unstable complex rib fractures, as well as those with less severe injuries. This result has been due in part to the expansion of indications for repair, as well as the development of new hardware systems to address a variety of fracture patterns and injuries. This joint advancement of operator techniques, outcomes research, and industry development has brought SSRF to the forefront of rib fracture management and challenged non-operative paradigms. The future of repair is now shifting focus, as surgeons develop minimally invasive approaches and challenge manufacturers to develop new systems, instruments, and materials to address increasingly complex fracture patterns. These expansions promise to make SSRF an increasingly effective form of management for traumatic rib fractures.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures in Successful Management of Severe Blunt Chest Trauma.

Early surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) improves outcomes in patients with flail physiology and severely displaced fractures. We present two cases of patients with severe chest injury and large flail segment who underwent SSRF while on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). The patients developed respiratory failure within 24hours of admission requiring VV-ECMO. The extent of their chest wall injury limited pulmonary mechanics prohibiting transition off VV-ECMO. Therefore, SSRF was performed on hospital days 2 and 3 and while on VV-ECMO support. Stabilizing the chest wall allowed for improved ventilation and successful decannulation from VV-ECMO on postoperative days 3 and 4. Ultimately, both achieved a functional recovery and were discharged home. These cases demonstrate a unique thoracic damage control strategy wherein SSRF is performed while on VV-ECMO. Improving chest stability and pulmonary mechanics with SSRF allowed for safe transition off VV-ECMO and achieved a favorable long-term outcome.

Door to door in 24: factors that allow surgical stabilization of rib fractures within 24 hours of admission

Door to door in 24: factors that allow surgical stabilization of rib fractures within 24 hours of admission

Association of Early Rib Plating on Clinical and Financial Outcomes: A National Analysis.

With reported improvements in patient outcomes, surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been increasingly adopted. While institutional series have sought to define the role of early SSRF, large scale analysis remains lacking. The present study evaluated clinical and financial outcomes of SSRF in a nationally representative cohort. Patients (≥16years) admitted with multiple rib fractures were identified using the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample. Those who underwent rib plating >14days following admission were omitted. Using restricted cubic spline analysis, patients who underwent SSRF within 2days of hospitalization were classified as Expedited while fixation >2 days were deemed Routine. Multivariable regressions were used to evaluate the association of operative timing on outcomes of interest. Of 8150 patients meeting final inclusion criteria, 4090 (50.2%) were Expedited. Compared to Routine, Expedited tended to be older but were of comparable race, primary payer, and income quartile. Traumatic mechanism was also similar but rates of concomitant sternal fracture as well as intra-abdominal and cardiac injuries were higher in Routine. After adjustment, Expedited was associated with lower odds of respiratory complications, which included need for mechanical ventilation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and pneumonia, compared to Routine. Expedited was associated with similar hospitalization duration but had lower incremental costs (β: -$19.1K, 95% CI: -24.1 to -14.2). Early SSRF was associated with lower likelihood of a number of respiratory complications and in-hospital costs. While patient selection criteria may limit our findings, expeditious fixation may limit morbidity while enhancing value of care.

Timing matters: Early versus late rib fixation in patients with multiple rib fractures and pulmonary contusion

BackgroundRecent literature has shown that surgical stabilization of rib fractures benefits patients with rib fractures accompanied by pulmonary contusion; however, the impact of timing on surgical stabilization of rib fractures in this patient population remains unexplored. We aimed to compare early versus late surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with traumatic rib fractures and concurrent pulmonary contusion. MethodsWe selected all adult patients with isolated blunt chest trauma, multiple rib fractures, and pulmonary contusion undergoing early (<72 hours) versus late surgical stabilization of rib fractures (≥72 hours) using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program 2016 to 2020. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for patient, injury, and hospital characteristics. Our outcomes were hospital length of stay, acute respiratory distress syndrome, unplanned intubation, ventilator days, unplanned intensive care unit admission, intensive care unit length of stay, tracheostomy rates, and mortality. We then performed sub-group analyses for patients with major or minor pulmonary contusion. ResultsWe included 2,839 patients, of whom 1,520 (53.5%) underwent early surgical stabilization of rib fractures. After propensity score matching, 1,096 well-balanced pairs were formed. Early surgical stabilization of rib fractures was associated with a decrease in hospital length of stay (9 vs 13 days; P < .001), decreased intensive care unit length of stay (5 vs 7 days; P < .001), and lower rates of unplanned intubation (7.4% vs 11.4%; P = .001), unplanned intensive care unit admission (4.2% vs 105%, P < .001), and tracheostomy (8.4% vs 12.4%; P = .002). Similar results were also found in the subgroup analyses for patients with major or minor pulmonary contusion. ConclusionThese findings suggest that in patients with multiple rib fractures and pulmonary contusion, the early implementation of surgical stabilization of rib fractures could be beneficial regardless of the severity of pulmonary contusion.

An initiative to assess and improve the resources and patient care processes used among Chest Wall Injury Society collaborative centers study (CWIS-CC2).

Over the last two decades, the acute management of rib fractures has changed significantly. In 2021, the Chest Wall injury Society (CWIS) began recognizing centers that epitomize their mission as CWIS Collaborative Centers. The primary aim of this study was to determine the resources, surgical expertise, access to care, and institutional support that are present among centers. A survey was performed including all CWIS Collaborative Centers evaluating the resources available at their hospital for the treatment of patients with chest wall injury. Data about each chest wall injury center care process, availability of resources, institutional support, research support, and educational offerings were recorded. Data were collected from 20 trauma centers resulting in an 80% response rate. These trauma centers were made up of 5 international and 15 US-based trauma centers. Eighty percent (16 of 20) have dedicated care team members for the evaluation and management of rib fractures. Twenty-five percent (5 of 20) have a dedicated rib fracture service with a separate call schedule. Staffing for chest wall injury clinics consists of a multidisciplinary team: with attending surgeons in all clinics, 80% (8 of 10) with advanced practice providers and 70% (7 of 10) with care coordinators. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have dedicated rib fracture research support, and 35% (7 of 20) have surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF)-related grants. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have marketing support, and 30% (8 of 20) have a web page support to bring awareness to their center. At these trauma centers, a median of 4 (1-9) surgeons perform SSRFs. In the majority of trauma centers, the trauma surgeons perform SSRF. Considerable similarities and differences exist within these CWIS collaborative centers. These differences in resources are hypothesis generating in determining the optimal chest wall injury center. These findings may generate several patient care and team process questions to optimize patient care, patient experience, provider satisfaction, research productivity, education, and outreach. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Use of robotic C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in surgical stabilization of rib fractures

IntroductionThe effectiveness of using intraoperative robotic C-arm cone-beam computerized tomography (CT) to locate rib fractures during surgery was compared to using pre-operative CT. MethodsPatients diagnosed with multiple rib fracture and treated surgically in the hospital between January 2019 and September 2020 were included. The study included two groups of patients. One group had their rib fractures identified using pre-operative CT, while the other group had their fractures localized using intraoperative cone-beam CT during surgery. The operative time, blood loss, number of incisions, length of incision, duration of chest drains, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and duration of post-operation stays were measured. ResultsA total of 12 patients received intraoperative cone-beam CT, while the remaining 18 patients only received pre-operative CT. Statistical analysis showed that the group treated with cone-beam CT had lower blood loss (p = 0.012), shorter incisions (p = 0.005), and better post-operation VAS scores (p = 0.027). There were also non-significant trends towards fewer incisions, shorter operation times, and shorter duration of chest drains in the group treated with cone–beam CT. ConclusionsIntraoperative localization of rib fracture sites with cone-beam CT is an effective method for rib fracture stabilization.

Intercostal cryonerve block versus elastomeric infusion pump for postoperative analgesia following surgical stabilization of traumatic rib fractures

ObjectivePatients with blunt thoracic trauma requiring surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) frequently experience severe pain. Further, a rising prevalence of opioid-tolerant patients sustain traumatic injuries. The optimal pain management adjunct for concurrent use with SSRF remains uncertain. This study compared outcomes in patients undergoing SSRF with concomitant cryonerve block (CryoNB) or ropivacaine 0.2% elastomeric infusion pump (EIP). MethodsA single-center retrospective comparative analysis was performed at a level II trauma center. A query of our institution's trauma registry of consecutive patients undergoing SSRF from October 2017 to November 2020 with either intercostal CryoNB or ropivacaine 0.2% EIP was conducted. Opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME), patient-reported pain scores by numerical rating scale, and pulmonary function measured by incentive spirometry effort (mL) were collected at baseline and on postoperative days 1–3. Results were analyzed using a linear-mixed-effects model. Length of stay (LOS), complications, and hospital charges were assessed as secondary outcomes. ResultsTwenty-six patients meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated. Patient demographics, injury, and surgical variables were similar between groups. The estimated effect for patients treated with CryoNB (n = 14) compared to EIP (n = 12) demonstrated a 25% (estimated -1.37 OME, 95% CI, -2.411 to -0.335, p = 0.01) reduction in hospital opioid requirements, fewer discharge opioids (41.3 mg (37.5–45) versus 175 mg (150- 200), p = 0.03), 22% (estimated -1.506, 95% CI, -2.722 to -0.290, p = 0.02) reduction in pain scores, and shorter postoperative LOS (4 days (4–5) versus 6 days (5–9.5), p = 0.04). Pulmonary function (estimated -48.8 mL, 95% CI, -312.74 to 215.05, p = 0.71), total hospital costs (CryoNB: $90,224 ± 34,633; EIP: $131,498 ± 73,072, p = 0.07), and complications were no different between cohorts. ConclusionThe addition of intercostal CryoNB as an adjunct to multimodal pain management in trauma patients undergoing surgical fixation of rib fractures may be of benefit. Based on our early data, this technique appears to be promising in reducing opioid requirements and providing an extended duration of pain control without increased costs or complications.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures is associated with better return on investment for a health care institution than nonoperative management.

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) continues to gain popularity due to patient benefits. However, little has been produced regarding the economic benefits of SSRF and its impact on hospital metrics such as Vizient. The aim of this study was to explore these benefits hypothesizing SSRF will demonstrate positive return on investment (ROI) for a health care institution. This is a retrospective review of all rib fracture patients over 5 years at our Level I trauma center. Patients were grouped into SSRF versus nonoperative management. Basic demographics were obtained including case mix index (CMI). Outcomes included narcotic requirements in morphine milliequivalents prior to discharge, mortality, and discharge disposition. Furthermore, actual hospital length of stay (ALOS) versus Vizient expected length of stay were compared between cohorts. Contribution margin (CM) was also calculated. Independent t-test, paired t-test, and linear regression analysis were performed, and significance set at p < 0.05. A total of 1,639 patients were included; 230 (14%) underwent SSRF. Age, gender, and Injury Severity Score were similar. Surgical stabilization of rib fracture patients had more ribs fractured (7 vs. 4; p < 0.001) and more patients with flail chest (43.5% vs. 6.7%; p < 0.001). Surgical stabilization of rib fracture patients also had a significantly higher CMI (4.33 vs. 2.78; p = 0.001). Narcotic requirements and mortality were less in the SSRF cohort; 155 versus 246 morphine milliequivalents ( p < 0.001) and 1.7% versus 7.1% ( p = 0.003), respectively. Surgical stabilization of rib fracture patients were more likely to be discharged home (70.4% vs. 63.7%; p = 0.006). Surgical stabilization of rib fracture patients demonstrated shorter ALOS where nonoperative management patients demonstrated longer ALOS compared with Vizient expected length of stay. Contribution margins for SSRF patients were significantly higher and linear regression analysis showed a CM $1,128.14 higher per patient undergoing SSRF ( p < 0.001). Patients undergoing SSRF demonstrate a significant ROI for a health care organization. Despite SSRF patients having a higher CMI, they were able to be discharged sooner than expected by Vizient calculations resulting in better a CM. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.